<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MOSES AND CHRISTIANITY HAVE SOME EXPLAINING TO DO!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://antiintellect.wordpress.com/2010/04/08/moses-and-christianity-have-some-explaining-to-do/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://antiintellect.wordpress.com/2010/04/08/moses-and-christianity-have-some-explaining-to-do/</link>
	<description>The inspired writing of a Black Gay Rights Activist, Feminist, and Atheist!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:02:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Godheval</title>
		<link>http://antiintellect.wordpress.com/2010/04/08/moses-and-christianity-have-some-explaining-to-do/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Godheval]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 03:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiintellect.wordpress.com/?p=245#comment-30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, in any case, it wouldn&#039;t be the Christians who would have to explain it, but the Jews.  The Old Testament (home to the 10 commandments) is theirs.

But neither Jews nor Christians, if they&#039;re being honest with themselves, or even know the history of their own religious traditions, would be able to argue that the 10 commandments - or really anything in the Bible - is wholly original.  Hardly any religion, or any lasting philosophy of any kind, didn&#039;t borrow from the culture and philosophy of their time.

All of these tenets, doctrines, stories, whatever are pieced together from pre-existent concepts, going as far back, probably, as the advent of human consciousness.  Just like how they say there are &quot;no original stories&quot; anymore.

The claim any religion has to originality is its particular configuration of the various memes (individual concepts) contained within it.

I mean, this is hardly the only thing, either.  The virgin birth, resurrection after 3 days (Horus), walking on water, the flood (Utnapishtim/Gilgamesh), the &quot;son&quot; (or sun) of God (pagan Godman in many systems), defying a mandate not to touch/eat/access something forbidden (Pandora), the crucifixion (Odin), December 25th birth (Mithras), and the list goes on...

But this isn&#039;t so much a strike against Judaism or Christianity in themselves, but more a strike against the idea that these religions hold any proprietary claim to an absolute &quot;truth&quot;.  That&#039;s where many religious people make their mistake, trying to push their beliefs as objective, when religion should only ever be subjective to the individual.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, in any case, it wouldn&#8217;t be the Christians who would have to explain it, but the Jews.  The Old Testament (home to the 10 commandments) is theirs.</p>
<p>But neither Jews nor Christians, if they&#8217;re being honest with themselves, or even know the history of their own religious traditions, would be able to argue that the 10 commandments &#8211; or really anything in the Bible &#8211; is wholly original.  Hardly any religion, or any lasting philosophy of any kind, didn&#8217;t borrow from the culture and philosophy of their time.</p>
<p>All of these tenets, doctrines, stories, whatever are pieced together from pre-existent concepts, going as far back, probably, as the advent of human consciousness.  Just like how they say there are &#8220;no original stories&#8221; anymore.</p>
<p>The claim any religion has to originality is its particular configuration of the various memes (individual concepts) contained within it.</p>
<p>I mean, this is hardly the only thing, either.  The virgin birth, resurrection after 3 days (Horus), walking on water, the flood (Utnapishtim/Gilgamesh), the &#8220;son&#8221; (or sun) of God (pagan Godman in many systems), defying a mandate not to touch/eat/access something forbidden (Pandora), the crucifixion (Odin), December 25th birth (Mithras), and the list goes on&#8230;</p>
<p>But this isn&#8217;t so much a strike against Judaism or Christianity in themselves, but more a strike against the idea that these religions hold any proprietary claim to an absolute &#8220;truth&#8221;.  That&#8217;s where many religious people make their mistake, trying to push their beliefs as objective, when religion should only ever be subjective to the individual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thegaytekeeper</title>
		<link>http://antiintellect.wordpress.com/2010/04/08/moses-and-christianity-have-some-explaining-to-do/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thegaytekeeper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 00:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiintellect.wordpress.com/?p=245#comment-26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh dear...I would LOVE to see them try to explain this one away...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh dear&#8230;I would LOVE to see them try to explain this one away&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
